Web Survey Bibliography
NSD has been member of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) since 1989. From the beginning, the ISSP surveys in Norway were administered as self-completion, paper and pencil mail surveys, the target population being people aged 16/18 to 79 years, residing in Norway, regardless of nationality and dwelling. The survey samples have been selected as SRS from the Central Register of Persons in Norway, providing sampling lists of named individuals with addresses and the characteristics gender, year of birth and marital status. Up to 2004 the unit nonresponse was stable, varying between 37 and 43 percent. With respect to gender and age net samples were slightly biased, due to higher unit nonresponse among elderly women (65+) and younger men (34-), beyond what could be ascribed to random variation only. From 2004 we have however seen the well-known picture of dramatically increasing unit nonresponse, reaching 50 percent in 2005 and 57 percent in 2007. Since 2008 it has levelled out on approximately 60 percent. The increased unit nonresponse has not been evenly distributed by gender and age. Younger rather than elderly women now seem to be underrepresented in the net samples, but this is not yet a consistent trend. Nonresponse among younger men has however increased more than other age-by-gender groups, reaching as high as 74 percent. High nonresponse rates pose a major threat to survey quality as they might cause biased estimators for the target population when respondents differ from nonrespondents on the variables of interest. As seen above, significant bias and changing bias patterns can be identified with respect to age and gender. The same could apply to important characteristics we can’t control for directly on individual level, for example education. During the last years NSD has therefore increasingly focused on planned mixed-mode designs, based on assumptions emerging in the literature about than ten years ago, that tailored questionnaires and implementations offering respondents (some) freedom of choice can reduce nonresponse and also improve data quality. In the ISSP survey fielded early in 2011, a web and a paper questionnaire were offered to the sample units A split-ballot design testing contact design (first contact and further follow-up of respondents) was implemented. In the presentation we will report on some results from the survey with respect to nonresponse, mode preferences, split ballot and data quality.
Workshop Homepage (abstract) / (presentation)
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Current Projects at University of Ljubljana; 2011; Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Collecting information with Knowledge technologies; 2011; Foulonneau, M.
- E-dater, Artificial Actors, and German Households; 2011; Hebing, M.
- DIME-SHS; 2011; Lesnard, L.
- Web based Data Collection – A Jungle becoming a Field or a Field becoming a Jungle? ; 2011; Ole Finnemann, N.
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2011; 2011
- Calibrating Non-Probability Internet Samples with Probability Samples Using Early Adopter Characteristics...; 2011; DiSogra, C., Cobb, C. L., Chan, E., Dennis, J. M.
- How Visual Design Affects the Interpretability of Survey Questions; 2011; Toepoel, V., Dillman, D. A.
- True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands; 2011; Das, M., Scherpenzeel, A.
- Web Survey Methodology: Interface Design, Sampling and Statistical Inference; 2011; Couper, M. P.
- Effect of interview modes on measurement of identity; 2011; Nandi, A., Platt, L.
- Maintaining Cross-Sectional Representativeness in a Longitudinal General Population Survey ; 2011; Lynn, P.
- Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 3: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2011; Burton, J., Budd, S., Gilbert, E., Jaeckle, A., McFall, S., Uhrig, S. C. N.
- The Effect of a Mixed Mode Wave on Subsequent Attrition in a Panel Survey: Evidence from the Understanding...; 2011; Lynn, P.
- Seeing Through the Eyes of the Respondent: An Eye-tracking Study on Survey Question Comprehension; 2011; Lenzner, A., Kaczmirek, L., Galesic, M.
- Eye Tracking in testing questionnaires: What’s the added value?; 2011; Tries, S.
- Panel Recruitment via Facebook; 2011; Toepoel, V.
- Usability and burden measurement in online forms; 2011; Thomsen, P.
- Dynamic Data Editing in online data collection for the Vacant Positions Survey; 2011; Stax, H.-P.
- Utilizing Web Technology in Business Data Collection: Some Norwegian, Dutch and Danish Experiences; 2011; Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Stax, H.-P.
- Web survey software; 2011; Slavec, A., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- Disentangling relative mode effects for the web survey mode in the Safety Monitor; 2011; Schouten, B., van de Brakel, J., Buelens, B., Klausch, L. T., van der Laan, J.
- Improving validity in web surveys with hard‐to‐reach targets: Online Respondent Driven Sampling...; 2011; Mavletova, A. M.
- Developing Electronic Questionnaires at Statistics Canada: Experiences and Challenges in a Changing...; 2011; Lawrence, D.
- Experiences with mixed mode mail & web-enquêtes in probability samples with known individuals; 2011; Kalgraff Skjak, K., Kolsrud, K.
- Effects of internet data collection in business surveys – the case of the Dutch SBS; 2011; Giesen, D.
- Ignoring the compatibility of online questionnaires may bias the psychological composition of your sample...; 2011; Funke, F.
- Video enhanced web survey; 2011; Fuchs, M., Kunz, T., Gebhard, F.
- Keeping Up Appearances: Maintaining standards during strategic changes in electronic reporting; 2011; Farrell, E., Hewett, K.
- Respondent engagement: using usability testing; 2011; Dowling, Z.
- Scrolling or paging - it depends; 2011; Blanke, K.
- Research Applications for Mobile Data Collection; 2011; Fawson, B.
- Results from Real-Time Data Collection (RTD) vs. Data from Traditional Panelists: Is it valid to combine...; 2011; Pingitore, G., Witten, S., Walker, A., Seldin, D., Ellrodt, R., Muns, N., Parks, C., Serrato, C.
- Widening the Net: A Comparison of Online Intercept and Access Panel Sampling; 2011; Bakken, D. G., Nawani, R.
- Making it fit: how survey technology providers are responding to the challenges of handling web surveys...; 2011; Macer, T.
- Probably the Best Bias in the World?; 2011; Dent, T.
- Optimus Modus: Comparing interviewing modes for visitor surveys; 2011; Stanley, N., Jenkins, S.
- The development of the KubeMatrix™ as a mobile app for Market Research Online Communities; 2011; Birks, D. F., Wilson, De.
- Online Research – Game On!: A look at how gaming techniques can transform your online research; 2011; Puleston, J.
- Engagement, Consistency, Reach – why the Technology Landscape Precludes All Three; 2011; Johnson, A., Rolfe, G.
- The use of paradata to improve data collection at Statistics Canada: Empirical results and research; 2011; Gambino, J., Wrighte, D.
- Medium Node: NSF Census Research Network; 2011; McCutcheon, A. L., Belli, R. F., Olson, K., Smyth, J. D., Soh, L.-K.
- A new online building survey system; 2011; Wang, Yic.
- A Comparison of Internet-Based Participant Recruitment Methods: Engaging the Hidden Population of Cannabis...; 2011; Temple, E. C., Brown, R. F.
- The German Access Panel and the Impact of Response Propensities; 2011; Amarov, B., Enderle, T., Muennich, R., Rendtel, U., Zins, S.
- Web Survey Process within the Concept of eSocial Sciences; 2011; Vehovar, V.
- Can biomarkers be collected in an Internet survey? A pilot study in the LISS panel; 2011; Avendano, M., Mackenbach, J., Scherpenzeel, A.
- Innovations in survey sampling design: Discussion of three contributions presented at the U.S. Census...; 2011; Opsomer, J.
- A Bayesian analysis of small area probabilities under a constraint; 2011; Nandram, B., Sayit, H.
- Adaptive network and spatial sampling; 2011; Thompson, S. K.